• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • German

Dynamics 365FO/AX Finance & Controlling

Dynamics 365FO/AX Finance & Controlling

Tag Archives: Dynamics AX

Vendor prepayments (1)

04 Monday Jan 2016

Posted by Ludwig Reinhard in Accounts Payable

≈ Comments Off on Vendor prepayments (1)

Tags

Dynamics AX, Prepayments, Purchase Order, Tax

Within this and the following blog posts I will deal with the question how prepayments for vendor purchases can be recorded in Dynamics AX. A special emphasis is thereby made on the tax regulations within the European Union which require that the value added tax (VAT) related the prepayment(s) can be deducted only at the time when the prepayment invoice is paid. For additional information on European tax regulations, please visit this site and/or local government websites.

Note: Within this and the subsequent posts, no difference is made between requested and actually paid (realized) prepayments from an accounting perspective. This issue will be addressed in more detail in the last post on vendor prepayments.  

Setup
Let’s get started by having a look of the setup required for recording vendor prepayments in Dynamics AX. The first thing that needs to be setup for recording vendor prepayments is a procurement category. Example:
EN_61_0005
All transactions recorded for this procurement category are posted on the vendor prepayment account “132200” to incorporate vendor prepayments in the company’s balance sheet. The next screenshot shows you the section of the inventory posting form where the vendor prepayment account needs to be setup.
EN_61_0026

The next setup step requires the establishment of a prepayment vendor posting profile as exemplified in the next screenshot. Please note that this prepayment posting profile needs to be setup with a special (“temporary”) VAT ledger account – in my example account no. 130850 – that records the VAT of the prepayment invoice once it gets posted. As explained before, the VAT recorded on this account cannot be deducted until the payment of the prepayment invoice is actually made.
EN_61_0010

After setting up the prepayment vendor posting profile, you have to make sure that the Accounts Payable parameters are linked to this profile.
EN_61_0015

The last setup required concerns the VAT tax codes, tax groups and item tax groups.

Against the background of the non-deductibility of the VAT at the time when the prepayment invoice is recorded, a separate VAT tax code (“InVAT19A”) is setup that records the non-deductible VAT amount posted. I linked this VAT tax code to the ordinary Accounts Payable sales tax group(s) and the “on accounts” (OA) item sales tax group. (Please note that the on account (OA) item sales tax group is setup together with the procurement category shown before).

In addition, I connected the VAT tax code “InVAT19A” with the non-deductible tax ledger account no. “130850” via the corresponding sales tax ledger posting group.

Finally, I linked the non-deductible VAT tax code “InVAT19A” with the ordinary (deductible) VAT tax code “InVAT19” in the payment sales tax code field. This linkage ensures that we are able to deduct the VAT once the prepayment invoice is paid.

The following screenshots summarize the tax setup made.
EN_61_0020 EN_61_0025

Process
Once all necessary setups are finished, the vendor prepayment process can be performed through the execution of the following four steps.

Step 1: Setup purchase order & record prepayment
The first step required is setting up the purchase order and recording the
prepayment(s) requested by the vendor. Example:
EN_61_0030
Please note that I recorded the gross amount of the prepayment the vendor asked for [5000 EUR net + 19% VAT (950 EUR) = 5950 EUR]. Also note that the prepayment procurement category needs to be selected in the prepayment form as illustrated in the previous screenshot.

Step 2: Post prepayment vendor invoice
The next step in the prepayment process is posting the prepayment invoice though the corresponding functionality.
EN_61_0035
When posting the prepayment invoice, the prepayment procurement category and the “on account” (OA) item sales tax group automatically defaults, as illustrated in the next screen-print.
EN_61_0040
As a result, Dynamics AX generates the following ledger posting:
EN_61_0045
What you can identify from this voucher is that the tax is recorded on the non-deductible VAT account “130850”.

Step 3: Pay prepayment vendor invoice
After the prepayment invoice is recorded in Dynamics AX it can be paid via an ordinary vendor payment journal.
EN_61_0050
The only thing you have to look for in this journal is selecting the prepayment check box in the payment tab that automatically changes the posting profile.
EN_61_0055
After generating the payment and posting the journal, the following transactions result:
EN_61_0060
What you can identify from the previous screenshot is first, the payment of the prepayment amount from our bank account and second, a transfer of the tax amount from the non-deductible VAT account (130850) to the ordinary (deductible) VAT account (130800).

Note: The screenshot at the lower right-hand corner shows the related vouchers generated in addition to the payment made. As the ledger accounts used in this voucher offset each other, they can be ignored here.

Step 4: Post final vendor invoice
The last step in the prepayment process is posting the final vendor invoice for the delivery of the goods ordered. When doing this posting you have to ensure that the prepayment made is applied and deducted. The next screenshots illustrate how this application can be made.
EN_61_0070 EN_61_0075
Whether or not the prepayment(s) made are correctly applied can be identified in the invoice line section that shows the prepayments that get deducted from the total invoice amount.
EN_61_0080
After posting the vendor invoice, the following vouchers can be identified:
EN_61_0085
The first three lines posted represent the ordinary vendor invoice posted for the total amount of the goods (100 pcs. * 230 EUR/pcs. = 23000 EUR + 19% VAT = 27370 EUR). Please note that the total VAT amount (4370 EUR) is posted on the ordinary VAT account 130800.

The last three lines highlighted in yellow color represent the deduction of the prepayment made. What is interesting (wrong) here is that Dynamics AX uses the non-deductible VAT account (130850) to record the VAT already paid in step 3. In order to highlight the problem with the last voucher, I summarized all transactions created during the prepayment process in the next image.
EN_61_0090
What you can identify from this summary is that the last voucher should credit the ordinary VAT account (130800). Yet, it actually uses the same – (wrong, while non-deductible) – VAT account (130850) that was used when posting the prepayment invoice.
As a result, 5320 EUR (950 EUR + 4370 EUR) – highlighted in red color – are posted on the ordinary deductible VAT account no. 130800 that results in a wrong, while too high VAT deduction.
At the same time, the non-deductible VAT account no. 130850 still shows a credit balance of 950 EUR.

 

Alternative Setup Option A:
As the previously illustrated standard setup of the prepayment functionality for purchase orders provided a problematic, while wrong outcome, I changed the setup of the procurement category by assigning the ordinary (“full”) item sales tax group as illustrated in the next screen-print.
EN_61_0095
In addition to this change, I also modified the sales tax prepayment account linked to the prepayment vendor posting profile by using the ordinary (deductible) VAT account 130800.
EN_61_0100
After repeating all prepayment process steps, the following vouchers remained.
EN_61_0105
What can be identified from this summary is that the total VAT amount posted and deducted is correct. Yet, the first “ordinary” VAT transaction is already recorded with the posting of the prepayment invoice. From a tax perspective this is too early and can lead to problems with tax authorities especially in cases where prepayment invoices are posted earlier than the final purchase vendor invoice for example due to long transportation times.

 

Alternative Setup Option B:
As the previously illustrated alternative setup option leads to a potential tax evasion, I changed the setup of the procurement category once again and linked it with an item sales tax group (“without”) that does not record any VAT.
EN_61_0110
Result: As before, after repeating all prepayment process steps, the following vouchers remained.
EN_61_0115
The posting summary illustrated in the previous screenshot shows that the VAT is posted and deducted at the time the final vendor invoice for the purchase order is recorded. This approach can be considered as very conservative and won’t result in problems with tax authorities. Yet, from a financial cash flow perspective this approach can be problematic and easily result in cash flow problems, especially if large amounts are involved.

 

Summary:
All approaches for recording vendor prepayment illustrated in this post are more or less problematic (wrong). As a result, if your company operates in a VAT environment, I would recommend not using the prepayment functionality available in the purchase order form for recording prepayments. Within the next posts I will show you some alternative approaches that result in correct tax and ledger transactions. Till then.

Management Reporter – Reports based on different Chart of Accounts

03 Thursday Dec 2015

Posted by Ludwig Reinhard in Management Reporter

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Chart of Accounts, Dynamics AX, Financial Consolidation, Management Reporter

When doing a financial consolidation, financial data from different companies need to be combined in a single “consolidation” report. As the data that need to be consolidated are often based on different Chart of Accounts (COA), the question arises how ledger accounts from different COA’s can be combined into a single consolidation report. This question will be answered in the following based on a simplified example.

Example:
The financial data of company DEMF and BRMF need to be consolidated. While the first company (DEMF) uses a “shared” COA, the second company (BRMF) uses a local Brazilian COA. What makes things even more complex is that company DEMF records all transactions in EUR-currency, while company BRMF keeps all its books in Brazilian reals. The next screenshot shows you the COA’s and currencies setup for the two companies.
EN_38_0005

In order keep the example as simple as possible, only the bank accounts of both companies are considered for the following illustrations.

In company DEMF only one single transaction with a total amount of 10000 EUR has been recorded on bank account (main account) “110200”.
EN_38_0010
In company BRMF two local currency transactions have been recorded on the bank account (main account) “1.1.1.2.02”.
EN_38_0015
The exchange rate used for consolidation purposes is 300 BRL / 100 EUR.
EN_38_0020
Against the background of those data, a financial consolidation report should show a total balance of 50000 EUR or 150000 BRL in the bank accounts line.
EN_38_0025
To realize this, the following setup has been done in Management Reporter.

 

Step 1: Setup of the row definition
The first step in setting up the consolidation report is mapping the different main accounts in the row definition of the report. This mapping in done by specifying separate row links that hold the main account information of both companies. Please see the following screenshot for an example.
EN_38_0030

Step 2: Setup of the reporting tree Definition
The next step is setting up a reporting tree. When doing this setup, you have to make sure that a reference is made between the different companies and the row definition / row links established in the first step.
EN_38_0035

Step 3: Setup of the column Definition
The third step is setting up a column definition as illustrated in the next screenshot.
EN_38_0040
Please note that you need to link the different columns with the reporting tree elements if you want to report on the different legal entities.

Step 4: Setup of the report Definition
The last step in the report generation is the combination of all previous elements (row definition, reporting tree and column definition) into a report. Please note that you need to select the reporting currency check box before running the report if you want to do a currency conversion once the report that gets generated.
EN_38_0045

Result:
Once the report is generated you can have a look at the data in the various currencies setup in Dynamics AX. The next two screenshots show you the EUR-currency and BRL-currency report.
EN_38_0050 EN_38_0055

Fixed asset statement report issues (Appendix)

07 Saturday Nov 2015

Posted by Ludwig Reinhard in Fixed Assets, Management Reporter

≈ Comments Off on Fixed asset statement report issues (Appendix)

Tags

DATEV, Dynamics AX, Fixed asset statement, German commercial code

The following screenshots provide you some additional information on the fixed asset posting profile setup used for the examples illustrated in the blog posts. Please not that separate ledger accounts are used for each combination consisting of (a) the fixed asset transaction type, (b) the fixed asset group and (c) the value model. EN_40_ANHANG_0005 EN_40_ANHANG_0010 EN_40_ANHANG_0015 EN_40_ANHANG_0020 EN_40_ANHANG_0025 EN_40_ANHANG_0030 EN_40_ANHANG_0035 EN_40_ANHANG_0040

Please note that the sales disposal parameters illustrated in the following screenshot could be setup in more detail. Yet, the major point that I want to make here is that the ledger accounts that are setup in this section differ from the ones used for recording the original fixed asset transaction. As an example, fixed asset acquisitions are recorded on ledger account 180500, while the offset transaction that is recorded when the fixed asset is sold is recorded on ledger account 180502.
EN_40_ANHANG_0045

As for fixed asset sales, separate sub-ledger accounts have been setup for recording the scrap of fixed assets. For details, please see the next screenshots. EN_40_ANHANG_0050EN_40_ANHANG_0055

The last screenshot included here shows some additional details of the ledger account setup. The term “PKW” included in square brackets represents the fixed asset group.
EN_40_ANHANG_0060

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Microsoft BizApps Deutschland Podcast

Dynamics UserGroup Deutschland

Project Accounting Book – Part 2

Project accounting book

Categories

  • Accounts Payable
  • Accounts Receivable
  • Bank Management
  • Book reviews
  • Budgeting
  • Cost accounting
  • Fixed Assets
  • General Ledger
  • Inventory
  • Management Reporter
  • Miscellaneous
  • Podcast
  • Project
  • Sustainability
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Advanced bank reconciliation Allocations Artificial Intelligence Bank reconciliation Budgeting Controlling Cost accounting Cost accounting module Cost center accounting customer D365 D365FO Dynamics 365 Dynamics AX Dynamics AX 2012 Electronic reporting Email Environment Fixed asset statement General Ledger journal Global Warming intercompany Inventory Inventory reconciliation invoice invoice recording IOT Management Accounting Management Reporter Modern Finance MS Flow MT940 PowerApps PowerAutomate PowerPlatform Project Project module Resource scheduling Sensor settlement SharePoint Sustainability Sustainability Accounting Tax time recording timesheet Vendor invoice recording Vendor payments WBS workflow

Important Websites

  • Dynamics AX/365FO Links

Legal

  • Disclaimer

Subcribe

  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Archives

  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • Dynamics 365FO/AX Finance & Controlling
    • Join 583 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Dynamics 365FO/AX Finance & Controlling
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...